8 October 2005 Earthquake of Southern Asia

The Shortcut Directory
.

u u u

Search: Google · msn Search · Yahoo! Search

.
Participating aid organizations, governmental agencies and departments, and Shortcut Directory partners: Log in here.
.

.
Earthquake, Pakistan, October 2005
.

.
"How can I help?"

The aid agencies and organizations on this page are reputable and effective. Visit them for advice. They'll give you general guidelines and/or specific instructions on how you can continue to save victims and help them recover from the horrible and far-reaching devastation to their regions of the Asian subcontinent on 8 October 2005.
.

Watchdog Websites:
Charity Navigator | CharityWatch.org | Give.org

Learn about Efficiency Ratings vs. Effectiveness

UK = United Kingdom
UN = United Nations
US = United States

... Action Against Hunger
... ActionAid International
... Adventist Development & Relief Agency International
... American Jewish World Service
... American Red Cross
... AmeriCares
... Architecture for Humanity
... AusAID
... Baptist World Aid
... B'nai B'rith International
... Brother's Brother Foundation
... Canadian International Development Agency
... Canadian Red Cross
... CARE (Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere)
... Catholic Relief Services
... Christian Aid
... Christian Children's Fund
... Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
... Church World Service
... Concern Worldwide
... Direct Relief International
... Doctors Without Borders / Medecins Sans Frontieres
... Episcopal Relief & Development
... Food for Life Global
... Food for the Hungry
... GOAL
... Habitat for Humanity International
... Human Relief Fund
... Humedica International
... Indian Red Cross
... International Aid
... International Medical Corps
... International Orthodox Christian Charities
... International Red Cross and Red Crescent
... International Relief Teams
... International Rescue Committee
... Islamic Aid
... Islamic Relief
... Lutheran World Relief
... Medical Assistance Programs (MAP) International
... Medair

... Mercy Corps
... Muslim Aid
... Muslim Hands
... Network for Good
... Northwest Medical Teams
... Operation USA
... Oxfam (Oxford Committee for Famine Relief) International
... Plan USA
... Presbyterian Church (USA)
... Project Concern International
... Project Hope
... Relief International
... ReliefWeb
... RescueCorps
... Salvation Army
... Samaritan's Purse
... Save the Children
... Stop Hunger Now
... UK Department for International Development
... UNHCR (UN High Commissioner for Refugees)
... UNICEF (UN International Children's Emergency Fund)
... United Methodist Committee on Relief
... USAID (US Agency for International Development)
... WFP (World Food Programme, United Nations)
... World Concern
... World Hope International
... World Relief
... World Vision

Finding Each Other:

... International Committee of the Red Cross
... Next of Kin Registry

Earthquake News:

       ... BBC News World Edition
       ... CNN
       ... Other Sources

Directory Quicklists to the Earthquake:

... Google
... Yahoo!

For the help you've already provided, thank you.

Search: Google · msn Search · Yahoo! Search

Efficiency Ratings vs. Effectiveness

On the whole, ratings are a good thing. But when choosing charities to which you're going to donate money, be aware that the efficiency ratings assigned to charities by watchdog groups can be misleading. More important is a charity's effectiveness in getting aid to victims.

For example, Charity A may dedicate 95% of received donations to direct material aid and only 5% to administration and fundraising, which is supposedly a good efficiency rating. But a good efficiency rating means nothing if 5% isn't enough money to get the other 95% to victims where and when they need it. The 95% has to be not only raised to begin with, but properly administered, properly managed. Otherwise it simply sits in Charity A's bank account, perhaps collecting interest, but definitely not providing water, food, medicine, clothing, shelter, counselling, and other aid to the victims, immediately and directly.

Charity B, on the other hand, may dedicate 20% of your donation to administration and fundraising, but that 20% may very well be competently, efficiently providing the other 80% of your donation to victims within a day after you've given it, or even within hours, in the form of water, food, medicine, clothing, shelter, counselling, and other aid. Charity B's so-called efficiency rating by a watchdog group may not be as high as Charity A's, but Charity B is a much more effective provider of aid. And, arguably, the more effective an aid group is, the more efficient it actually is, too, watchdog ratings and their definitions notwithstanding.

Take Oxfam, for example (with which we have no affiliation, by the way). You may look at efficiency ratings for Oxfam and scratch your head skeptically. Yet Oxfam is clearly and provably among the best relief-and-recovery aid organizations in the world, and it has been for decades.

Therefore, don't automatically dismiss charities because their so-called efficiency ratings aren't as high as others'. Judge them also by their histories, reputations, and overall effectiveness. Finding out what's an effective, reputable charity is homework quickly and easily done. There are an awful lot of terrific aid organizations doing wonderful and effective work even though they don't meet the standards of what Watchdog X or Watchdog Y considers efficient.
..

Search: Google · msn Search · Yahoo! Search